Defining
a Hero
Jane Austen’s heroines are, usually the focal point
of the story plot-line, in how the character develops into a young woman at the
end of the novel. Heroes are strategically placed in the direction of the
female lead character; in order to complete the marriage plot proposal. The
unique perspective, Austen allows the reader to explore is the “realistic”
aspects behind her characters. Edward Ferrars, brings a unique perspective to
the stereotypical characterization of the term, hero. The reader becomes
engaged to understand a character, who does not match up to the title of “hero”
imposed by the author. Edward’s demur keeps him under the radar, fitting to his
personality. A particular passage stood out to the reader, because of the
social implications disbursed upon Edward’s future. Austen elaborates the
reader on Edward’s great expectations: “But he was neither fitted by abilities nor
disposition to answer the wishes of his mother and sister, who longed to see
him distinguished −as− they hardly knew what. They wanted him to make a fine figure
in the world in some manner or other” (Austen 14). The author’s statement, stands out within the
whole passage, because Edwards’ mother seems conjure up an idea about her son
without having a concise goal in mind. The
abrupt use of dashes in between “as” illustrates how Mrs. Ferrars’ doesn’t know
what she wants her son to be, it also to brings together two ideas, which don’t
match up. Austen is cleverly describing the relationship between Edward and his
mother. The significance of the passage allows the reader to understand the
unique social implications Ferrars is forced upon, he doesn’t seem to have control
over his own future. Edward is unlike any hero, readers have come across in
other novels. Austen fabricates a displaced hero, who lacks courage and security.
What is the importance of Edward Ferrars in the novel, especially under the title
role of hero?
Interesting final question: what is the importance of giving us an "unexpected hero" in S&S? Makes me wonder if the role of Edward has anything in common with the role of Catherine in NA, our "unexpected heroine." Edward's role seems of a piece with Austen's general project of elevating or rewarding the quiet, peripheral figures (Melissa has mentioned this a few times in class). We are supposed to see heroism in the observer, not just the stereotypical "great man."
ReplyDelete